death by colonoscopy? you bet...

The Annals of Internal Medicine — a blue ribbon publication of the American College of Physicians —  just released a bombshell report on colon cancer screening. The editorial preceding the report concluded the following [link]:

I have been researching the exact same issue for years now, and my investigative report into screening colonoscopies is even more blunt than the one above. It tells things the way they are: screening colonoscopies are yet another moneymaking bubble and consumer fraud, except this one is also deadly.

If you are in the high-risk group for colorectal cancer, just like I am, study this site, and you may escape it “unscratched.” If you are close to or past 50, and are in the low-risk group, the next 18 minutes may save your life and prevent other cancers. So here is Part I:

[Watch Part II, view Transcript, read Commentaries, or watch on YouTube]

Key Highlights From Part I:

Dramatic increase in the incidence of colorectal cancer. Despite tens of millions of screening colonoscopies performed between the years 2000 and 2007, the annual incidence of colorectal cancer in the United States increased by about 30,000 more cases [link].

More polyps are missed than found. Up to a third of all colonoscopies routinely miss polyps and cancerous tumors [link]. According to the report I cited at the beginning of this page, practically 100% of all polyps are missed in the right (ascending) colon.

Increased cancer risk from radiation. X-ray exposure from a single virtual colonoscopy increases one’s lifetime risk of cancer by 20% [link]. Virtual colonoscopies are now recommended every 5 years. By age 70 one’s risk of developing any other form of cancer grows to 100%. Killing you with another form of cancer before the colon gets affected is one hell-of-the-way to “prevent” colon cancer.

Polypectomy doesn't prevent cancers. According to the research published back in 2006, the screened patients in all of the studies developed colorectal cancer “at the same rate as would be expected in the general population without screening”  in the next few years, even though they have removed all found polyps [link].

No clinical research to support the rationale of colonoscopy screening. According to the American Cancer Society, up till now (that’s in 2008) “…There are no prospective randomized controlled trials of screening colonoscopy for the reduction in incidence of or mortality from colorectal cancer. [link]” In other words, the recommendation to undergo colonoscopy screening is based entirely on its income potential, not proven health benefits.

No clinical research to support the effectiveness of virtual colonoscopies. The National Cancer Institute is even more explicit: “…it is not yet known [in 2008] for certain whether colonoscopy can help reduce the number of deaths from colorectal cancer.” and “Whether virtual colonoscopy can reduce the number of deaths from colorectal cancer is not yet known. [link]”

A large scale investigation of colonoscopy screening demonstrated its complete futility. The 18 years long Minnesota Colon Cancer Control Study included 46 plus thousand patients between the ages of 50 and 80. It demonstrated only a 0.6% reduction in the incidence of colorectal cancer [link]. Statistically speaking, this difference is even less than the chance outcome of one thousand coin flips.

Colonoscopy screening increases mortality from all other causes, research shows. The Telemark Polyp Study I demonstrated a 57% increase in mortality among screened patients vis-à-vis unscreened controls [link]. The decrease in the incidence of colorectal cancers was only… 2%, which, statistically speaking again, is essentially none at all.

Well, if you can't cheat it, then prevent it! Here is Part II.

[Part II Transcript, watch on YouTube]

 

The following sections expand on Part II with practical advice and additional commentaries:

» Colorectal Cancer Risk Factors

» Side Effects Of Screening Colonoscopies

» Colorectal Cancer Prevention

» Frequently Asked Questions About Screening Colonoscopies

» Open Letter To Ms. Couric

You can also access all these sections from the top and bottom menu, and selected sidebars.

Got A Gut Feeling
Your Gut Is Out Of Whack?

Gut Sense explains how to reverse the widespread digestive disorders related to diets commonly overloaded with processed carbohydrates, indigestible fiber, allergenic plant proteins, carcinogenic vegetable oils, and other man-made substances incompatible with digestion, health, and longevity.

It's true that some people may consume this kind of diet with relative impunity and for a long time. This doesn't mean that it's good, safe, or healthy, but simply testifies to the amazing ability of the human body to adapt to changing circumstances. If you belong to that lucky group — good for you, and enjoy it while it lasts. If not, and/or the joy ride is over, then Gut Sense is for you!

Once you are done reading, you may also recognize (as I did while researching Gut Sense) that the mainstream treatment and prevention of all colorectal disorders has one overriding goal in mind: to extract as much profit as possible from seeing you from your first appointment with the doctor to your last appointment with the undertaker. In other words, to ensure that you'll never get well.

There is, however, some poetic justice to all this mess: just like mafia wars kill the Mafiosi and ruin their families, so do fiber, drugs, screening colonoscopies, and colorectal disorders maim and murder medical professionals and ruin their families just as mercilessly. Or, as one hell-bent fellow aptly framed it: “Dead doctors don't lie!” Indeed...

This leaves me with the faint hope that my message will be heard, and, eventually, that the change will come. On the other hand, it may not... So, instead of waiting in vain until 'the fat lady sings,' particularly if you have that gut feeling that 'something ain't right,'  read Gut Sense and  make that 'change' today. More...

Author's note

A wealthy acquaintance of mine died at age 56 from brain cancer. His brain tumor was probably contributed to by earlier treatment for colon cancer. In turn, his colon cancer was probably caused by frequent virtual colonoscopies and coronary angiograms — a preventative computer-assisted x-ray (CT scan) of, respectively, the colon and heart.

With a strong conviction that money can buy just about anything, a $1000 scan to him was less than $1 to most people. So, why not, as he once told me, buy some “peace of mind,” right? Apparently, not...

I wrote my books and developed this site for people who still value a buck and wish to prevent common gastrointestinal disorders and escape colorectal cancer without relying on cancer-causing screening colonoscopies, addictive laxatives, harmful fiber supplements, ineffective and deadly drugs, and irreversible, complication-prone surgeries.

The information on this site complements and expands the content of Gut Sense and Fiber Menace. Both books evolved from my extensive research in the field of forensic nutrition. Unlike orthodox nutrition, which studies and promotes 'health food,' forensic nutrition studies why people get sick and die from a presumably 'healthy' diet.

Konstantin Monastyrsky

   

Full text is free.
Read more...

Font size:

Search site:

Read more...

 

[top]